Monday, November 30, 2009

THE DUAL GOVERNMENT OF BENGAL

THE DUAL GOVERNMENT OF BENGAL Following the Treaty of Allahabad (1765), Robert Clive set up the infamous dual system of administration in Bengal wherein the Com­pany acquired the real power, while the. responsibility of administration rested on the Nawab of Bengal. Under the 'dual' or double government system, the Company got both the diwani (revenue) and nizamat (civil administration) functions of Bengal from two different sources-diwani from the Mughal emperor and nizamat from the nawab of Bengal.

As the diwan, the Company was authorised to collect revenues of the province, while through the right to nominate the deputy subahdar it was in a position to control the nizamat or the police and judicial powers. The deputy subahdar could not be removed without the consent of the Company. However, at this point of time, the Company was neither willing nor able to collect the revenue directly.

Hence, it appointed two deputy diwans for exercising diwani functions-Mohammad Reza Khan for Bengal and Raja Sitah Roy for Bihar. Mohammad Reza Khan also functioned as deputy nizam. In this way, the whole administration of Bengal was exercised through Indian agency, although the actual authority rested with the Company.
The dual government system held a great advantage for the British-they had power without responsibility. The Nawab and his officials were responsible for administration, but they had no power to discharge it.

The system had many weaknesses that ultimately led to administrative breakdown. The peasantry of Bengal suffered greatly due to the decline of agriculture and arbitrary revenue demands. Trade and commerce were disrupted, and the industry and skills ruined. .

5 comments:

  1. what upa goverment is embracing to continue in power....a new policy of policy paralysis to to govern a communally,politically,socially fragile country.
    sonia gandhi in the name of inclusive growth vested the supreme power in a body chaired by it,NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL,subordinating the government to a status of puppet in her hands with responsibility but no power to execte it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It was really a helpful answer for my daughter

    ReplyDelete